
Barack Obama's right to privacy was in question recently when on vacation with his family in Greensboro, North Carolina. At first, his campaign refused to expose the location of the vacation, but when pressured by CNN's "Where in the World is Barack Obama" game, the mystery location was forced out. Followed relentlessly by a lone CNN camera, Obama was filmed saying he was just "Trying to be on vacation." CNN did not agree. The decision to try to avoid the media was not up to Obama, obviously proved by CNN, and further confirmed by comments from NBC's Chuck Todd who wrote, “we did a thorough debate internally and did our due diligence on this and felt it wasn't necessary this time; that doesn't mean we won't do this in the future; this was a decision made on this particular vacation.” Similarly, Jeff Zeleny of the New York Times said, “The decision was made to not cover Senator Obama’s vacation because he is not the nominee or presumptive nominee.” In both comments and in CNN's coverage, the decision to have a private vacation was clearly out of Obama's hands. Had the New York Times and NBC decided to cover Obama, they certainly would have found justification for their intrusion into his vacation.
So what is fair coverage of a candidate? And when do personal questions become too personal? Go ahead, Wax Politic!
No comments:
Post a Comment